February 04, 2012, 12:26:18 PM

Author Topic: License plates  (Read 8749 times)

Grumpy 1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 115
  • Rep: +0/-1
Re: License plates
« Reply #105 on: February 08, 2010, 06:41:29 AM »
I see where the folks in Sturgis showed up on ATV's at a cracker barrel to protest SB 175 that is taking away license plates.  We best gather the troops for a trip to Pierre.

carpe diem

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
  • Rep: +0/-0
    • Email
Re: License plates
« Reply #106 on: February 08, 2010, 01:35:42 PM »
I see where the folks in Sturgis showed up on ATV's at a cracker barrel to protest SB 175 that is taking away license plates.  We best gather the troops for a trip to Pierre.

That would help I would think.  A ring of them all around the capital building.  When is the hearing?
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a well preserved body, but rather to slide in sideways, body thoroughly used up, worn out, and screaming, “WOO HOO, what a ride!”

Grumpy 1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 115
  • Rep: +0/-1
Re: License plates
« Reply #107 on: February 09, 2010, 11:37:42 AM »
Just got word that the transportation committee hearing will be at 7:45am, Wed, Feb. 17.  People should be there NLT 7;20am so we can schedule speakers. State government will have speaker there to support the bill.  Critical that we make our voices heard. 
 

Grumpy 1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 115
  • Rep: +0/-1
Re: License plates
« Reply #108 on: February 13, 2010, 08:28:18 AM »
You can find all the codified state laws by going to http://legis.state.sd.us/index.aspx  plus your current session and legislators.  I'd hope all the members would learn to use this site and not be misled by someone who wants to keep folks from learning the laws etc.  The following laws are in the draft by the senator to be repealed!
 
 32-20-12.   Off-road vehicles--Operation on certain lands as misdemeanor--Registration--Title certificate. No person may operate on a public street or highway an off-road vehicle except for crossing from one side of the road to the other. A person twelve years of age or older may operate an off-road vehicle in a highway ditch if the vehicle is operated as close as possible to the outer edge of the highway right-of-way. However, no person may operate an off-road vehicle in a highway ditch along the interstate highway system, or operate an off-road vehicle on any lands owned, leased, or controlled by the Department of Game, Fish and Parks, or any highway ditch located within, except on a designated off-road vehicle area or designated trail, or operate an off-road vehicle in a highway ditch that is designated as part of the state snowmobile trails system pursuant to chapter 41-19 or a public bike trail. A violation of this section is a Class 2 misdemeanor.

     Off-road vehicles need not be registered and licensed for use upon the highways except as provided in § 32-20-13. Off-road vehicles shall be titled. The Department of Revenue shall issue a certificate of title for off-road vehicles the same as for other motor vehicles subject to the provisions of chapter 32-3.

   32-20-12.1.   Ordinances prohibiting operation of off-road vehicles in ditches--Exceptions--Regulatory signs. Notwithstanding the provisions of § 32-20-12, the Transportation Commission or any board of county commissioners by ordinance may prohibit the operation of off-road vehicles in any highway ditch along any section of highway under its jurisdiction. However, neither the Transportation Commission nor any board of county commissioners may prohibit an off-road vehicle from crossing one side of the highway to the other. This section does not affect off-road vehicles used in normal agricultural operation or service vehicles of any utility while in the line of duty for the utility. For the purposes of this section, the term, utility, means any provider of electric, gas, water, sewer, pipeline, or telecommunications service.

     Notice of any restriction made pursuant to this section shall be given by placing and maintaining regulatory signs at each end of the section of highway and at each point of intersection. The signs shall be of substantial construction which conspicuously indicates the restriction.

  32-20-13.   All-terrain vehicle licensed as motorcycle--Requirements--Use on interstate highway system prohibited--Violation as misdemeanor. Any all-terrain vehicle with four or more wheels and with a combustion engine having a piston or rotor displacement of two hundred cubic centimeters or more may be licensed as a motorcycle pursuant to chapter 32-5 to be used on a public highway. Prior to being licensed the all-terrain vehicle shall meet the necessary light, brake, and other vehicle accessory requirements provided by chapters 32-15, 32-17, and 32-18 that are applicable to motorcycles. The licensed all-terrain vehicle may not be operated on the interstate highway system. A person who operates such a licensed all-terrain vehicle on the interstate highway system is guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor
 
Have you checked out the new web site at www.southdakotaaatv.com and sign up.   Ed

Grumpy 1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 115
  • Rep: +0/-1
Re: License plates
« Reply #109 on: February 15, 2010, 05:08:16 PM »
If we defeat SB 175 in committee you better plan on a victory ride in the Black Hills and if you folks plan one back there I'll see how many I can head to Eastern SD for another victory ride. GETTER DONE

Grumpy 1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 115
  • Rep: +0/-1
Re: License plates
« Reply #110 on: February 17, 2010, 08:54:46 AM »
We won, Thanks to all who went to Pierre of contacted the legislators.  It was unanimous vote to move to the 41st day.  Yippee

Thumper700

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 442
  • Rep: +0/-0
Re: License plates
« Reply #111 on: February 17, 2010, 10:08:52 AM »
So we won, but it's not over?  Does moving to the 41st day mean that it will be discussed further?  Sorry, I don't know all the lingo and how everything works exactly. 
2005 Suzuki King Quad 700

Got 2 cylinders?  You're gonna need them!

Grumpy 1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 115
  • Rep: +0/-1
Re: License plates
« Reply #112 on: February 17, 2010, 11:04:27 AM »
It could be brought back either hog housed of otherwise.  Just need to be aware but with a unanimous vote for the 41st day, it would be a little tough I would think.  Knowbody likes to get beat and then beat again.  It was recommended by the chair that they come back in another year with a trail funding bill.  Which would seem the right thing to do.  Otherwise if one has to fight it again there is a good chance to not have as much cooperation in getting to where both sides want to be.

stumper

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2826
  • Rep: +1/-1
  • Team Brute Force
    • fishing dakota
    • Email
Re: License plates
« Reply #113 on: February 17, 2010, 11:10:14 AM »
Great, thanks for keeping us informed!!!

2007 650 SRA
2005 660 Raptor SE

You only have one Liver ,so Liver up!!!

South Dakota ATV

Re: License plates
« Reply #113 on: February 17, 2010, 11:10:14 AM »

Gunner

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 744
  • Rep: +0/-0
Re: License plates
« Reply #114 on: February 17, 2010, 11:29:54 AM »
Awesome.  Great News.
Boys have a penis.  Girls have a vagina.

bottlerocket

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 640
  • Rep: +0/-0
Re: License plates
« Reply #115 on: February 17, 2010, 12:33:57 PM »
That is great news.  Thanks for all your efforts to those that helped.  ;D
08 King Quad
VDI- copper head

Grumpy 1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 115
  • Rep: +0/-1
Re: License plates
« Reply #116 on: February 17, 2010, 08:12:02 PM »
Any one remeber this
The Lyin King
Guest
 Re: License plates
« Reply #43 on: December 02, 2009, 06:13:11 PM »Quote For those of you who are so quick to castigate and dismiss the BlueRibbon Coalition for their efforts on your behalf I submit the following.

The short story is that this whole issue is about trying to develop a funding mechanism for trails in SD.  In the process of doing that, proponents of the funding for trails discovered very quickly there were a lot of factions and people in HIGH places in the State who want the license plates and ALL ability to ride ATVs and UTVs on roads taken away completely.

In order to develop the necessary support to get a funding mechanism in place, and also to salvage some long term capability to ride on roads between trails and other places, the BRC has developed a compromise that can still allow for that to happen, albeit not on highways.  Even at that, the Legislation various groups want to introduce allows for County, City or other Local Government to override and allow for riding on hardened surface roads under their jurisdiction.

In fact, based on those who the BRC has spoken with in the State, the license plates are going to eventually go away because the State has way too much exposure legally and financially.  This is the only State in the Union with a loophole in the motorcycle laws that allows for licensing ATVs and UTVs to drive on highways.
It is what it is folks, beat on your Public Servants and not the BRC!

« Last Edit: December 02, 2009, 06:18:56 PM by The Lyin King » Report to moderator    Logged

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Grumpy 1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 115
  • Rep: +0/-1
Re: License plates
« Reply #117 on: February 17, 2010, 08:20:24 PM »
This one I love
The Lyin King
Guest
 Re: License plates
« Reply #43 on: December 02, 2009, 06:13:11 PM »Quote For those of you who are so quick to castigate and dismiss the BlueRibbon Coalition for their efforts on your behalf I submit the following.

The short story is that this whole issue is about trying to develop a funding mechanism for trails in SD.  In the process of doing that, proponents of the funding for trails discovered very quickly there were a lot of factions and people in HIGH places in the State who want the license plates and ALL ability to ride ATVs and UTVs on roads taken away completely.

In order to develop the necessary support to get a funding mechanism in place, and also to salvage some long term capability to ride on roads between trails and other places, the BRC has developed a compromise that can still allow for that to happen, albeit not on highways.  Even at that, the Legislation various groups want to introduce allows for County, City or other Local Government to override and allow for riding on hardened surface roads under their jurisdiction.

In fact, based on those who the BRC has spoken with in the State, the license plates are going to eventually go away because the State has way too much exposure legally and financially.  This is the only State in the Union with a loophole in the motorcycle laws that allows for licensing ATVs and UTVs to drive on highways.

It is what it is folks, beat on your Public Servants and not the BRC!

« Last Edit: December 02, 2009, 06:18:56 PM by The Lyin King » Report to moderator    Logged

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------